Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Seventh Circuit· 4/27/2017

United States v. Terzakis

Citations

  • 854 F.3d 951
  • 2017 WL 1505316
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7437

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellant was not required to cross-appeal or to obtain certificate of appealability to reargue grounds the district court rejected because the theory was part of the record and did not propose to expand his rights under the judgment
  • holding appellant was not required to cross‐appeal or to obtain certificate of appealability to reargue grounds the district court rejected because the theory was part of the rec‐ ord and did not propose to expand his rights under the judg‐ ment
  • holding appellant was not required to cross‐appeal or to obtain certificate of appealability to reargue grounds the district court rejected because the theory was part of the rec‐ ord and did not propose to expand his rights under the judg‐ ment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Hamilton, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.