Skip to main content
· 6/3/2003

United States v. Donald Heavrin

Citations

  • 330 F.3d 723
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10924
  • 2003 WL 21262484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding Hyde Amendment requires a single holistic analysis of “the prosecution’s position as a whole”
  • noting that a Hyde Amendment award may be appropriate “[e]ven if the district court determines that part of the government’s case has merit” so long as “the government’s ‘position’ as a whole was vexa- tious, frivolous, or in bad faith”
  • reversal of a Hyde Amendment award is required where the reviewing court is left with “a definite and firm conviction” that “a mistake has been made” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Siler, Gilman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.