· 7/9/2009
Narducci v. Moore
Citations
- 572 F.3d 313
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15107
- 2009 WL 1956327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a “district court is entitled to find that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is forfeited”
- holding that the defendants forfeited their qualified immunity argument when they raised it for the first time in their reply brief
- explaining that a “district court is entitled to find that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is forfeited”
- explaining that a “district court is entitled to find that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is forfeited”
- explaining that a “district court is entitled to find that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is forfeited”
- noting that a “district court is entitled to find that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is forfeited”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Williams, Lawrence
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.