Skip to main content
· 7/9/2009

Narducci v. Moore

Citations

  • 572 F.3d 313
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15107
  • 2009 WL 1956327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a “district court is entitled to find that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is forfeited”
  • holding that the defendants forfeited their qualified immunity argument when they raised it for the first time in their reply brief
  • explaining that a “district court is entitled to find that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is forfeited”
  • explaining that a “district court is entitled to find that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is forfeited”
  • explaining that a “district court is entitled to find that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is forfeited”
  • noting that a “district court is entitled to find that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is forfeited”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Williams, Lawrence

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.