· 11/7/2006
United States v. Smith, Richard
Citations
- 373 U.S. App. D.C. 324
- 467 F.3d 785
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 27453
- 2006 WL 3196556
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[D]istrict courts retain some reservoir of jurisdiction—distinct from the rules of criminal procedure themselves—to entertain motions after final judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Randolph, Griffith, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.