Skip to main content
· 11/7/2006

United States v. Smith, Richard

Citations

  • 373 U.S. App. D.C. 324
  • 467 F.3d 785
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 27453
  • 2006 WL 3196556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[D]istrict courts retain some reservoir of jurisdiction—distinct from the rules of criminal procedure themselves—to entertain motions after final judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randolph, Griffith, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.