United States v. Kevyn Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant could not seek relief on direct appeal “based on retroactive Amendment 782”
• concluding that \district courts in § 3582(c)(2) proceedings cannot make findings inconsistent with that of the original sentencing court\
• holding that a district court had jurisdiction—meaning the power to adjudicate—a motion for a reduced term of imprisonment even though it was without the authority to grant the motion because the defendant did not satisfy the statutory criteria for relief
• holding that a district court had jurisdiction—meaning the power to adjudicate—a motion for a reduced term of imprisonment even though it was without the authority to grant the motion because the defendant did not satisfy the statutory criteria for relief
• declining § 3852(c) relief based on an amendment that did not have the effect of lowering the defendant's applicable guideline range
• noting Graham’s view that defendant’s ineligibility for reduced sentence implicates jurisdiction, but concluding that “§ 3582(c)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).