Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 1/3/2012

United States v. Smith

Citations

  • 668 F.3d 427
  • 2012 WL 9293
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Ind. Code § 9-21-8-25 does not define “turning” but concluding based upon common dictionary definition that a “roughly 120-degree right” turn was a sufficient “rotat[ion]” to constitute a turn

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Posner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.