N.D. Illinois· 5/21/2013
In re Miller
Citations
- 493 B.R. 55
- 2013 WL 2178014
- 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 2120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that joint debtors are ineligible for chapter 13 relief if their total combined debts exceed § 109(e)’s debt limits
- “When a statute is clear, a court’s only task is to give effect to its meaning. Once that is done, judicial inquiry is complete.”
- \It is not the place of courts to rewrite the Code * * * [or] even to interpret Code provisions to further particular congressional policies * * * if no interpretation is necessary. Section 109(e) is clear. No interpretation is necessary.\
- “It is not the place of courts to rewrite the Code * * * [or] even to interpret Code provisions to further particular congressional policies * * * if no interpretation is necessary. Section 109(e) is clear. No interpretation is necessary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goldgar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
- In the Matter of Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson, Debtors. Comprehensive Accounting Corporation v. Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. PearsonSixth Circuit· 1985-10-09· cited 151×
- In Re: Arthur Lionel Scovis Jenny Scovis, Debtors. Arthur Lionel Scovis Jenny Scovis v. Christen Brun HenrichsenNinth Circuit· 2001-05-11· cited 151×
- In Re Farrar-JohnsonN.D. Illinois· 2006-09-15· cited 105×
- Spivey v. Vertrue, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2008-06-11· cited 83×
- Kovacs v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2010-07-29· cited 79×
- In Re Michael v. Frierdich, Sr., Debtor v. Steven v. Mottaz, Trustee of the Estate of Michael v. Frierdich, Sr. v. Beverly OswaldSeventh Circuit· 2002-06-21· cited 72×
- Soppet v. ENHANCED RECOVERY CO., LLCSeventh Circuit· 2012-05-11· cited 64×
- In re ChambersSeventh Circuit· 2003-11-04· cited 63×
- Craig Corp. v. Albano (In Re Albano)N.D. Illinois· 1985-11-07· cited 54×
- Joseph Jaskolski and National Insurance Crime Bureau v. Rick DanielsSeventh Circuit· 2005-10-21· cited 46×
- Hedquist v. Fokkena (In Re Hedquist)Eighth Circuit· 2006-04-21· cited 36×
- Roberts v. Boyajian (In Re Roberts)First Circuit· 2002-02-08· cited 21×
- United States v. HeadSeventh Circuit· 2009-01-15· cited 16×
- United States v. SmithSeventh Circuit· 2012-01-03· cited 15×
- In Re WertsD. Kansas· 2009-08-19· cited 13×
- In Re HansenN.D. Illinois· 2004-11-03· cited 9×
- In Re BernickE.D. Virginia· 2010-09-07· cited 8×
- In re RiosD. Massachusetts· 2012-08-21· cited 8×
- Hounsom v. United StatesM.D. Florida· 2005-05-13· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.