Censke v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[u]nless the judge could convince [the defendant] to change his mind, the judge had no choice but to allow [the defendant] to proceed [at sentencing], as he had insisted, without counsel.”
• finding a knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel at sentencing
• collecting cases; “a court has no obligation” to appoint standby counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).