United States v. Fishman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[w]e will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare assertion does not preserve a claim” that the appellant “fail[ed] to develop [the] argument or provide any citations to authorities or the record”
• finding no variance because \record amply support[ed] the jury's determination that there was only a single conspiracy\
• “A single conspiracy does not splinter into multiple conspiracies because members come and go.”
• “The . . . indictment specifically stated that there were more conspirators, ‘known and unknown,’ and the fact that not all were charged does not necessarily mean they operated in a separate conspiracy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).