Tenth Circuit· 6/9/2008

United States v. Redcorn

Citations

528 F.3d 727
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12363
2008 WL 2332005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the defendants hadn’t shown plain error because the evidence wasn’t obviously withheld by the prosecution
explaining that, “as a general proposition,” use of the mails or wire after the scheme has reached fruition “will not constitute grounds for a conviction”
noting that the Rule 33 standard is “easier to meet” with a Brady claim
noting that no evidence had been presented that the wire transfers were necessary to conceal the fraud and pointing out that the transfers actually made the fraud even more obvious
noting that no evidence had been presented that the wire transfers were necessary to conceal the fraud and pointing out that the transfers actually made the fraud even more obvious
noting that issues not raised in an opening brief are deemed abandoned or waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meconnell, O'Brien, Baldock, McConnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.