United States v. Redcorn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendants hadn’t shown plain error because the evidence wasn’t obviously withheld by the prosecution
• explaining that, “as a general proposition,” use of the mails or wire after the scheme has reached fruition “will not constitute grounds for a conviction”
• noting that the Rule 33 standard is “easier to meet” with a Brady claim
• noting that no evidence had been presented that the wire transfers were necessary to conceal the fraud and pointing out that the transfers actually made the fraud even more obvious
• noting that no evidence had been presented that the wire transfers were necessary to conceal the fraud and pointing out that the transfers actually made the fraud even more obvious
• noting that issues not raised in an opening brief are deemed abandoned or waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).