Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Tenth Circuit· 2/8/2010

United States v. Schneider

Citations

  • 594 F.3d 1219
  • 2010 WL 430915

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that we can affirm on alternative grounds only when they’re clear from the record
  • noting “[t]he power of district courts to manage their dockets is deeply ingrained in our jurisprudence”
  • finding an untimely challenge to an indictment waived under Rule 12 for failure to raise before trial
  • “The power of district courts to manage their dockets is deeply ingrained in our jurisprudence.”
  • “The power of district courts to manage their dockets is deeply ingrained in our jurisprudence.”
  • “A specific allegation within the count that a single continuing scheme exists is not necessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, O'Brien, Gorsuch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Schneider

29 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.