Tenth Circuit· 2/8/2010

United States v. Schneider

Citations

594 F.3d 1219
2010 WL 430915

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that we can affirm on alternative grounds only when they’re clear from the record
noting “[t]he power of district courts to manage their dockets is deeply ingrained in our jurisprudence”
finding an untimely challenge to an indictment waived under Rule 12 for failure to raise before trial
“The power of district courts to manage their dockets is deeply ingrained in our jurisprudence.”
“The power of district courts to manage their dockets is deeply ingrained in our jurisprudence.”
“A specific allegation within the count that a single continuing scheme exists is not necessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, O'Brien, Gorsuch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named United States v. Schneider

29 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.