Skip to main content
· 5/24/2001

United States v. Haber

Citations

  • 251 F.3d 881
  • 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2661
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 10705
  • 2001 WL 557996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “untranscribed portions of the trial in this case do not constitute ‘significant and substantial’ omissions from the trial transcripts” and were not prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Baldock, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.