United States v. Abdorasool Janati Forouzandeh Janati

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “district courts have wide-ranging control over management of . . . courtroom procedures[] and the admission of evidence”
• stating that “district courts have wide-ranging control over management of their dockets” and that “[t]he scope of the district court's discretion . . . is and must be particularly broad”
• stating that “district courts have wide-ranging control over management of their dockets” and that “[t]he scope of the district court’s discretion . . . is and must be particularly broad”
• stating that “district courts have wide-ranging control over management of their dockets” and that “[t]he scope of the district court’s discretion . . . is and must be particularly broad”
• recognizing district courts’ “wide-ranging control over management of their dockets”
• describing difference between Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 summary demonstratives and Federal Rule of Evidence 611(a) pedagogical devices

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).