United States v. Roy Ryan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing restitution order against insolvent defendant under the Act because “a defendant’s financial situation may well change in the future, making him able to pay some if not all the restitution ordered”
• Where defendant challenged award of restitution pursuant to the VWPA, holding that \[d]istrict courts are accorded broad discretion in ordering restitution.\
• in ordering restitution, court may consider potential improvement in defendant's financial situation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).