United States v. Michael F. Logar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]ndigency at the time of sentencing is not a bar to ordering a defendant to pay restitution in the future.”
• where the district court “d[oes] not identify any record support for the loss to those victims,” “[i]t follows that remand is necessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).