Supreme Court· 6/26/1974

Dorszynski v. United States

Citations

418 U.S. 424
94 S. Ct. 3042
41 L. Ed. 2d 855
1974 U.S. LEXIS 26

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “once it is determined that a sentence is within the limitations set forth in the statute under which it is imposed, appellate review is at an end”
noting “the general proposition that once it is determined that a sentence is within the limitations set forth in the statute under which it is imposed, appellate review is at an end”
reiterating “the general proposition that once it is determined that a sentence is within the limitations set forth in the statute under which it is imposed, appellate review is at an end”
observing that the YCA “focused primarily on correction and rehabilitation”
finding of ‘no benefit’ under the Federal Youth Corrections Act must be based on record but no express statement of supporting reasons is required
requiring sentencing court to make an explicit finding on the record that youthful offender would not benefit from treatment under the Federal Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5005 et seq.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burger, Marshall, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

471 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Dorszynski v. United States

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.