United States v. Ingles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “a camp house” that had been vacant for several months at the time of the fire was still a “dwelling” under § 2K1.4 “in light of the fact that at the time of the fire the structure was furnished as a functioning residence”
• establishing wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, requires proof of a “scheme to defraud”
• mailings not part of execution of fraud or incident to essential part of completion of scheme
• “One ‘causes’ the mails to be used ‘[w]here one does an act with knowledge that the use of the mails will follow in the ordinary course of business, or where such use can reasonably be foreseen.’” (quoting Pereira v. 10 No. 11-40643 United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8–9 (1954))
• discussing conspiracy to commit wire fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).