Seventh Circuit· 2/10/1999
United States v. Robert v. Spears
Citations
- 159 F.3d 1081
- 1998 WL 774149
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “For a defendant to successfully assert a due process violation based on an unjustified pre-indictment delay, he must first show that the delay caused actual and substantial prejudice to his right to a fair trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Manion, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Gonzalez-HuertaTenth Circuit· 2005-04-08· cited 733×
- United States v. Richard O'HaraSeventh Circuit· 2002-08-20· cited 116×
- United States v. Rangi KnightThird Circuit· 2001-09-06· cited 107×
- United States v. Brian K. McMutuary and Dante A. GrierSeventh Circuit· 2000-06-21· cited 65×
- United States v. BrownFifth Circuit· 2000-06-29· cited 63×
- United States v. Rufino FalconSeventh Circuit· 2003-10-29· cited 46×
- United States v. Jeremy D. HagenowSeventh Circuit· 2005-08-31· cited 46×
- State v. BruleNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-03-31· cited 46×
- United States v. Kenneth G. Brockman, United States of America v. Carolyn A. KrugerEighth Circuit· 1999-08-19· cited 37×
- United States v. Jerry JarrettSeventh Circuit· 2006-05-09· cited 37×
- Michael Ackerman v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2016-04-05· cited 37×
- Allen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-08-09· cited 32×
- United States v. Eric C. HowardSeventh Circuit· 1999-06-01· cited 31×
- United States v. William HaglerSeventh Circuit· 2012-11-21· cited 26×
- United States v. Rodney HendersonSeventh Circuit· 2003-07-25· cited 22×
- United States v. Stanley E. AlgeeSeventh Circuit· 2002-10-31· cited 21×
- People v. HallAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-03-10· cited 20×
- United States v. Mark BurgeSeventh Circuit· 2012-06-27· cited 13×
- Schiro v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-06-19· cited 11×
- United States v. Brian K. McMutuary and Dante A. GrierSeventh Circuit· 1999-05-05· cited 10×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 1,581×
- United States v. Dale J. Doerr, John Paul Doerr, Josephine Christofalos, Christa D. Pixley, and Archie J. PixleySeventh Circuit· 1989-10-03· cited 161×
- United States v. Marius CanoySeventh Circuit· 1994-10-20· cited 150×
- United States v. David D. SchoolcraftThird Circuit· 1989-07-18· cited 140×
- United States v. Joseph R. KollerSeventh Circuit· 1992-04-22· cited 125×
- United States v. Lynell R. EwingSeventh Circuit· 1997-11-18· cited 105×
- United States v. Thomas J. BassfordFirst Circuit· 1987-04-20· cited 86×
- United States v. Stanley Sowa, Jr., Also Known as Alfred Junior, IISeventh Circuit· 1994-08-30· cited 81×
- United States v. James C. HastingsFourth Circuit· 1997-09-17· cited 80×
- United States v. StokesFirst Circuit· 1997-08-28· cited 78×
- United States v. Bernard Comosona, Jr.Tenth Circuit· 1988-06-09· cited 78×
- United States v. Richard A. Heidecke, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 1990-05-01· cited 68×
- United States v. Joseph C. DickersonSeventh Circuit· 1992-09-14· cited 63×
- United States v. Frank FuzerSeventh Circuit· 1994-03-18· cited 62×
- United States v. Fred WallaceSeventh Circuit· 1994-08-19· cited 58×
- United States v. Chong W. TaiSeventh Circuit· 1994-12-05· cited 50×
- Bronfman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court· 1995-01-17· cited 50×
- United States v. Carl A. DemichaelSeventh Circuit· 1982-10-29· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.