Skip to main content
· 4/20/1987

United States v. Thomas J. Bassford

Citations

  • 812 F.2d 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the failure of a party to object to a magistrate’s legal conclusions may result in the loss of the right to de novo review” in the district court – but not in the loss of the statutory right to appellate review
  • impermissible conditions are those such as race, religion, or the desire to prevent the exercise of the defendant’s constitutional rights
  • “[T]he conduct of two- independent sovereigns does not lend itself to the concept of vindictive prosecution.”
  • \[T]he conduct of two independent sovereigns does not lend itself to the concept of vindictive prosecution.\
  • impermissible conditions are those such as race, religion, or the desire to prevent the exercise of the defendant's constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Wisdom, Aldrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.