United States v. Richard O'Hara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no Brady violation where the defendant \had sufficient time to make use of the material disclosed\
• finding no suppression where evidence pertinent to the issue of the witness’s credibility was disclosed with “plenty of time ... to make use of the information”
• finding no suppression where evidence pertinent to the issue of the witness’s credibility was disclosed with “plenty of time . . . to make use of the information”
• no Brady violation where government disclosed information during trial but defendant had sufficient time to make use of it
• “Evidence for Brady purposes is deemed ‘suppressed’ if . . . the evidence was not otherwise available to the defendant through the exercise of reasonable diligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).