Skip to main content
· 11/18/1997

United States v. Lynell R. Ewing

Citations

  • 129 F.3d 430
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 32244
  • 1997 WL 716032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “last minute guilty plea is not usually evidence of a heart full of remorse”
  • noting that application of the obstruction of justice adjustment generally “does not require the prosecution to provide evidence of any actual prejudice or impact”
  • noting that USSG § 3C1.1 applies when a defendant attempts to obstruct justice and generally 16 “does not require the prosecution to provide evidence of any actual prejudice or impact”
  • noting that timeliness of defendant’s purported acceptance is relevant in the reduc- tion inquiry
  • finding that previous convictions for similar conduct justify an upward departure
  • explaining that defendant’s \extensive number of criminal history points\ and the \fact that [the defendant] repeatedly engaged in the same course of criminal conduct\ were each adequate grounds upon which to base an upward departure pursuant to section 4A1.3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Manion, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.