Skip to main content
· 4/22/1992

United States v. Joseph R. Koller

Citations

  • 956 F.2d 1408
  • 1992 WL 39213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no Sixth Amendment violation where accused spent months in pretrial detention while government witness recovered from heart surgery
  • “[The defendant’s] general allegation that his witnesses’ memories faded during the delay does not rise to the level of specificity required to show actual prejudice.”
  • “[The defendant’s] general allegation that his witnesses’ memories faded during the delay does not rise to the level of specificity required to show actual prejudice.”
  • defendant was not entitled as matter of right to serve convictions concurrently and thus was not prejudiced by a pre-indictment delay
  • “Allegations that witnesses’ memories have faded is not enough.”
  • same with respect to sentence computation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Fairchild

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.