Skip to main content
· 6/10/1991

United States v. Robert Steven Lujan

Citations

  • 936 F.2d 406
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 6730
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4380
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11486
  • 1991 WL 95703

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Findings of fact concerning misleading statements and omissions ... are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard.\
  • “Findings of fact concerning misleading statements and omissions . . . are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard.”
  • “Findings of fact concerning misleading statements and omissions ... are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard.”
  • “We are persuaded by those other circuits which have concluded that suppression was not required by the section 2518(l)(e) nondisclosure under similar findings of unintentional noncompliance.”
  • trial court's decision to provide trial transcript to jury reviewed for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Nelson, Carroll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.