Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 8/19/1996

United States v. Collicott

Citations

  • 92 F.3d 973
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 10106
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6157
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20644
  • 45 Fed. R. Serv. 449
  • 1996 WL 467070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that de-clarant’s motive to fabricate would have existed from the moment she was stopped by the police
  • holding that the district court erred, because the statements at issue were hearsay and not admissible under Rule 801(d)(1)(B
  • holding that the district court erred, because the statements at issue were hearsay and not admissible under Rule 801(d)(1)(B), never mentioning whether the district court abused its discretion, but rather seems to have reviewed the hearsay determination de novo
  • holding that the district court erred, because the statements at issue were hearsay and not admissible under Rule 801(d)(1)(B), never mentioning whether the district court abused its discretion, but rather seems to have reviewed the hearsay determination de novo
  • holding that the district court erred, because the statements at issue were hearsay and not admissible under Rule 801(d)(1)(B), never mentioning whether the district court abused its discretion, but rather seems to have reviewed the hearsay determination de novo
  • noting that federal rule 106 “does not compel admission of otherwise inadmissible hearsay evidence” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Pregerson, Tashima

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Collicott

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.