Seventh Circuit· 8/27/2002

United States v. Ceballos

Citations

302 F.3d 679
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that DEA agents’ interpretations of “it,” them,” and “both” as referring to methamphetamine shipments was helpful
concluding that DEA agents’ interpretations of “it,” them,” and “both” as re- ferring to methamphetamine shipments was helpful
holding that DEA agents with extensive drug investigation experience were properly qualified as experts in drug code
holding that DEA agents with extensive drug investigation experience were properly qualified as experts in drug code
holding that DEA agent could testify that certain pronouns used in recorded conversations referred to drugs \because of the agents' vast experience with drug code language\
explaining that “judges and legislators sometimes use the term jurisdiction to erroneously refer to a court’s authority to issue a specific type of remedy, rather than to the court’s subject-matter jurisdic- tion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Ceballos

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.