United States v. Ceballos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that DEA agents’ interpretations of “it,” them,” and “both” as referring to methamphetamine shipments was helpful
• concluding that DEA agents’ interpretations of “it,” them,” and “both” as re- ferring to methamphetamine shipments was helpful
• holding that DEA agents with extensive drug investigation experience were properly qualified as experts in drug code
• holding that DEA agents with extensive drug investigation experience were properly qualified as experts in drug code
• holding that DEA agent could testify that certain pronouns used in recorded conversations referred to drugs \because of the agents' vast experience with drug code language\
• explaining that “judges and legislators sometimes use the term jurisdiction to erroneously refer to a court’s authority to issue a specific type of remedy, rather than to the court’s subject-matter jurisdic- tion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).