California Court of Appeal· 10/30/1991
People v. Gamez
Citations
- 235 Cal. App. 3d 957
- 286 Cal. Rptr. 894
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 13572
- 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8774
- 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1275
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- sufficient evidence where shooting was a “retaliatory strike” for shooting of member of defendant’s gang
- sufficient evidence where shooting was a \retaliatory strike\ for shooting of member of defendant's gang
- police officer could properly offer expert opinion evidence regarding ongoing criminality of gangs; California criminal gang statute required evidence of gang’s past criminal conduct and ongoing criminal nature
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Wallin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-12-23· cited 783×
- People v. OlguinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-12-30· cited 358×
- People v. SengpadychithCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-10-17· cited 315×
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2005-06-16· cited 294×
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-05-29· cited 240×
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-08-26· cited 221×
- People v. DuranCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-04-30· cited 194×
- People v. KillebrewCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-11-08· cited 168×
- People v. Frank S.California Court of Appeal· 2006-08-01· cited 165×
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-01-13· cited 140×
- People v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-10-15· cited 134×
- People v. Van VyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-10-25· cited 117×
- People v. FunesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-03-31· cited 104×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa· 1994-03-23· cited 66×
- People v. RomeroCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-06-01· cited 64×
- Anthony Garcia v. Tom L. Carey, WardenNinth Circuit· 2005-01-20· cited 44×
- People v. Ramon T.California Court of Appeal· 1997-08-20· cited 42×
- People v. CliftonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-04-24· cited 39×
- City of Costa Mesa v. SofferCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-10-29· cited 30×
- People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-02-23· cited 29×
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-07-03· cited 7,961×
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 2,648×
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 2,188×
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-02-29· cited 2,018×
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1939-03-27· cited 1,416×
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-12-03· cited 513×
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-10-02· cited 510×
- People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-08-05· cited 505×
- People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-12-31· cited 409×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. FlowersSupreme Court· 1964-06-01· cited 361×
- Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-02-28· cited 274×
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal· 1981-05-29· cited 234×
- Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-12-22· cited 193×
- People v. TowlerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-03-25· cited 160×
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-10-05· cited 153×
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-02-25· cited 110×
- County of Nevada v. MacMillenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 107×
Other cases named People v. Gamez
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.