United States v. Anthony Chadwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “concern for avoiding undue emphasis on particular trial testimony” is not present when “permitting a jury to view properly admitted exhibits” (emphasis in original)
• noting that jury is generally “entitled to view paper exhibits, photographs, and physical exhibits” during deliberations
• upholding application of § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) enhancement when two firearms were found in the car from where defendant sold drugs, considering that the two guns “emboldened him to undertake his illicit drug sales.”
• “The concern for avoiding undue emphasis on particular trial testimony did not limit the discretion of the district court to send the video exhibit to the jury room ‘for review like all other evidentiary exhibits.’”
• “The concern for avoiding undue emphasis on particular trial testimony did not limit the discretion of the district court to send the video exhibit to the jury room ‘for review like all other evidentiary exhibits.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).