Skip to main content
· 2/3/1995

United States v. Robert Longfellow

Citations

  • 43 F.3d 318
  • 1994 WL 709025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a fraudulent refinancing of a loan constituted a separate scheme to defraud the credit union, apart from the initial loan
  • holding that the bank fraud statute punishes execution
  • finding two year passage of time between acts “much” longer than cases where only a single execution has been found
  • “Although Longfellow himself received no additional cash as a result of the refinancing, he deprived the Credit Union of an opportunity for reimbursement through foreclosure.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Cudahy, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.