· 11/2/1977
United States v. Bernard G. Rubin
Citations
- 559 F.2d 975
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statement by defendant that he has “reason to believe” his conversations were monitored is insufficient
- improper impeachment of defense witness harmless error because government’s case against defendant so strong
- court does not have to determine the degree of the enterprise’s taint
- discussing but not deciding the issue
- discussing but not deciding the issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goldberg, Hill, Kerr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.