Skip to main content
· 9/2/1992

United States v. Eddie Fryer

Citations

  • 974 F.2d 813
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 20561
  • 1992 WL 210674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • limiting our review of a suppression ruling to the pretrial record in the same way
  • limiting our review of a suppression ruling to the pretrial record in the same way
  • limiting our review of a suppression ruling to the pretrial record in the same way
  • limiting our review of a suppression ruling to the pretrial record in the same way
  • officer must have “specific, articulable facts which, in combination with inferences to be drawn from those facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion”
  • after signaling a car to pull over for a traffic violation, the officer observed furtive movements between the driver and the passenger; the court held that these are the kind of specific, articulable facts that warrant a search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.