United States v. Richard B. Allender

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that future appreciation can be considered where there is “an enforceable agreement to pay a calculable sum”
• holding interest on loan is not opportunity cost and includable in calculation of loss
• holding interest on loan is not opportunity cost and includable in calculation of loss
• holding “the four loans challenged in this case are separate executions”
• “The test for validity is not whether the indictment could have been framed in a more satisfactory manner, but whether it conforms to minimal constitutional standards.”
• fact that each transaction “put the bank at risk for the funds loaned” was significant in determination of whether they were separate executions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).