United States v. Rioux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[t]he identified systematic defect defines . . . the particular pool\
• “[T]he second and third prongs of the Duren test, unfair representation and systematic exclusion, are intertwined inextricably.”
• “[T]he second and third prongs of the Duren test, unfair representation and systematic exclusion, are intertwined inextricably.”
• failure to counteract “such private sector influences as voting patterns, demographic trends, and cultural differences” not systematic exclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).