United States v. Harry Lloyd Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that technical violations of procedures prescribed by the Act do not constitute a substantial failure to comply with the Act
• where there was a trivial infraction of the Doyle rule which was not linked to the defendant's exculpatory story, mention of the defendant's silence was harmless error
• where there was a trivial infraction of the Doyle rule which was not linked to the defendant’s exculpatory story, mention of the defendant’s silence was harmless error
• strongly criticizing Government for commenting on defendant’s silence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).