· 5/13/1994
United States v. Reginald Hallman
Citations
- 23 F.3d 821
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10687
- 1994 WL 182837
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that where there is an intervening arrest, the court may not consider alternatives for determining whether the pair of sentences are related
- restitution order “may not be based on some future fortuitous event that may befall the appellant, but must be based on realistic expectations”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloviter, Hutchinson, Seitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.