Skip to main content
· 5/13/1994

United States v. Reginald Hallman

Citations

  • 23 F.3d 821
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10687
  • 1994 WL 182837

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that where there is an intervening arrest, the court may not consider alternatives for determining whether the pair of sentences are related
  • restitution order “may not be based on some future fortuitous event that may befall the appellant, but must be based on realistic expectations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Hutchinson, Seitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.