Skip to main content
· 6/26/2000

United States v. Undray Bradley

Citations

  • 218 F.3d 670
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14573
  • 2000 WL 816079

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[a]pplication [n]ote 3 requires that if the criminal conduct is separated by arrests, the ensuing convictions are never considered related.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Diane, Rovner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.