· 8/31/1992
United States v. James Edwin Walling
Citations
- 974 F.2d 140
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 20487
- 1992 WL 207622
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- For the purposes of the IADA, the federal government “is considered a single state.”
- “The IADA applies to transfers between states, not transfers within a state. Hence, the IADA has no application if a prisoner in federal custody in one federal judicial district faces another federal indictment in a different federal judicial district.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brorby, Ebel, Van Sickle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.