United States v. Raymond Robin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adding that these factors favor reassignment \where a judge has repeatedly adhered to an erroneous view after the error is called to his attention\
• discussing standard as factor but characterized as separate ground for remand in Londono
• observing that “proof of personal bias requires] recusa[l]”
• original trial judge might have difficulty disregarding erroneously received evidence; reassignment ordered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2106
• “Throughout the Second Circuit resentencing, in the absence of directions to the contrary by this court, is usually conducted upon remand by the same judge.”
• “We had an attomey-to-attorney relationship. He was a great guy, is a great guy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).