American Ad Management, Inc. v. General Telephone Company Of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in assessing injury to 2 competition, courts must focus on anticompetitive effects “in the market where 3 competition is [allegedly] being restrained”
• noting that, in assessing injury to 8 competition, courts must focus on anticompetitive effects “in the market where 9 competition is [allegedly] being restrained”
• noting 14 that an “antitrust injury” is necessary to give rise to antitrust standing
• “it is not the status as a consumer or competitor that confers antitrust standing, but the relationship between the defendant’s alleged unlawful conduct and the resulting harm to the plaintiff’
• “Antitrust injury requires the plaintiff to have suffered its injury in the market where competition is being restrained.”
• “[T]he antitrust laws are only intended to preserve competition for the 21 benefit of consumers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).