Skip to main content
· 9/25/2000

United States v. Marion Seltzer, Esq., Vaughn Rosario, A/K/A Vaughn Michaels

Citations

  • 227 F.3d 36
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23738

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the \inherent power of the district court includes the power ... to santion attorneys for ... violations of court orders or other conduct which interferes with the court's power to manage its calendar and the courtroom ...\
  • vacating sanctions and remanding for further proceedings where attorney had not been given proper notice and an opportunity to be heard
  • imposing sanction based on “the lawyer’s negligent or reckless failure to perform his or her responsibility as an officer of the court.”
  • discussing requirements for bad faith when imposing sanctions pursuant to a district court's inherent powers
  • noting district court’s ability to invoke inherent power to sanction misconduct “that is not undertaken for the client’s benefit”
  • vacating sanctions and remanding for further proceedings where attorney had not been given proper notice and an opportunity to be heard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, Leval, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.