United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding case to a new judge after the judge repeat- edly dismissed an indictment even after the case was remanded to him by the Court of Appeals with direction that the indictment be reinstated
• potential for greater penalty does not render charges in superseding indictment broader than those in original indictment
• potential for greater penalty does not render charges in superseding indictment broader than those in original indictment
• examining whether a superseding indictment broadened the original indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).