United States v. Raphael R. Levy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a Supreme Court remand does not prevent a court of appeals “from applying its prudential rules in a uniform and consistent manner”
• explaining that this court’s prudential rule that issues not raised in the opening brief are abandoned applies to defendants who attempt to belatedly raise a Booker argument
• providing that issues not raised in opening brief are abandoned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).