Skip to main content
· 12/19/2008

United States v. Horsfall

Citations

  • 552 F.3d 1275
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25860
  • 2008 WL 5263773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant’s affirmative withdrawal of a sentencing objection waives review of the objection on appeal
  • explaining that a defendant waives a sentencing objection by affirmatively withdrawing that objection at the sentencing hearing
  • stating that a defendant’s withdrawal of a sentencing objection generally precludes appellate review of the objection for plain error
  • allowing the government to present victim impact evidence when the plea agreement authorized it to inform the court of “all facts pertinent to the sentencing process”
  • finding no plain error in admission of victim impact statement in child pornography case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes, Wilson and Fay, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.