· 6/1/1995
United States v. Ram Singh
Citations
- 54 F.3d 1182
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13496
- 1995 WL 325249
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appellate courts do not weigh witnesses' credibil- ity on appeal
- stating that \newly discovered evidence\ means \evidence discovered since the trial\
- stating that “newly discovered evidence” means “evidence discovered since the trial”
- remanding for additional fact-finding where district court’s findings did not support its enhancement
- “Without ruling out the possibility that a rare example might exist, we have never allowed a new trial unless defendant can establish all five elements.”
- “Without ruling out the possibility that a rare example might exist, we have never allowed a new trial unless defendant can establish all five elements.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Luttig, Williams, Osteen, Middle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.