· 5/11/1989
United States v. Kenneth Wayne Daughtrey, A/K/A Kenneth Wayne Daughtry
Citations
- 874 F.2d 213
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14645
- 1989 WL 48031
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that whether the defendant was a minimal or minor participant in a crime to be an “essentially factual” inquiry
- “While [one defendant] may prove to be more involved in criminal activity, it does not require a minimal or minor [r]ole in the [o]ffense be assigned to [other defendants] who fully participate in . . . the scheme.”
- “While [one defendant] may prove to be more involved in criminal activity, it does not require a minimal or minor [r]ole in the [o]ffense be assigned to [other defendants] who fully participate in . . . the scheme.”
- same for minor role adjustment
- same for minor role adjustment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Phillips, Wilkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.