Skip to main content
· 5/11/1989

United States v. Kenneth Wayne Daughtrey, A/K/A Kenneth Wayne Daughtry

Citations

  • 874 F.2d 213
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14645
  • 1989 WL 48031

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that whether the defendant was a minimal or minor participant in a crime to be an “essentially factual” inquiry
  • “While [one defendant] may prove to be more involved in criminal activity, it does not require a minimal or minor [r]ole in the [o]ffense be assigned to [other defendants] who fully participate in . . . the scheme.”
  • “While [one defendant] may prove to be more involved in criminal activity, it does not require a minimal or minor [r]ole in the [o]ffense be assigned to [other defendants] who fully participate in . . . the scheme.”
  • same for minor role adjustment
  • same for minor role adjustment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Phillips, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.