United States v. Harold R. Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court’s statement from the bench that it overruled the objections filed by the defendant, taken together with the court’s Statement of Reasons form, satisfied Rule 32 because it demonstrated that the court was adopting each of the PSR’s findings
• “It is self-evident that, in expressly overruling [defendant’s] objections to the PSR, the court was in fact adopting the controverted PSR findings.”
• “It is self-evident that, in expressly overruling Walker’s objections to the PSR, the court was in fact adopting the controverted PSR findings.”
• district court's adoption of presentence report's recom- 3 mended factual findings is adequate if context makes clear that all defendant's objections are thereby resolved
• by discerning the factual basis for the district court's decision, appellate court can undertake a meaningful review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).