Skip to main content
· 5/5/1992

United States v. Marshall G. Peters and Linda Peters

Citations

  • 962 F.2d 1410
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 6017
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3831
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 8825
  • 1992 WL 88698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming application of vulnerable victim enhancement because the defendants had “sought out and targeted ... only individuals whom they believed had poor credit histories”
  • woman who participated in mail fraud scheme masterminded by her husband was not entitled to minor participant status
  • receiving economic benefit considered to weigh against minor participant status
  • people with poor credit histories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Browning, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.