Skip to main content
· 7/2/1997

United States v. Douglas D. Wilson, United States of America v. Douglas D. Wilson

Citations

  • 118 F.3d 228
  • 80 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5281
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 16448
  • 1997 WL 362776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing \a substantial tax deficiency\ among the elements of a violation of section 7201
  • noting the district court ‘“was simply fulfilling its obligation to clarify confused factual issues or misunderstandings, to correct inadequacies of examination or cross-examination’”
  • “The limitations period for a violation of § 7212(a) ... begins to run on the date of the last corrupt act.”
  • evidence of defendant-attorney's efforts to assist client in concealing assets from IRS sufficient to support conviction under sec. 7201
  • no abuse of discretion when district court \did not impose its own view of the evidence on the jury\
  • “The limitations period 22 for a violation of § 7212(a) . . . begins to run on the date of the last corrupt act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murnaghan, Motz, Stamp, Northern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.