United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/ (99-1003) v. Jack William Tocco, (98-2312/2426)/ Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the relevant conduct rules apply to the determination of “underlying racketeering activity”
• noting that dual roles of a witness can be properly demarcated when testimony occurs at different times during trial in conjunction with limiting instructions
• finding that a rational trier of fact could have found backdating of an I-9 form to have a tendency to influence an ICE investigation
• considering whether \the district court's voir dire sufficiently explored the prospective jurors' . . . individual ability to be fair and impartial\
• considering whether “the district court’s voir dire sufficiently explored the prospective jurors’ . . . individual ability to be fair and impartial”
• finding no abuse its discretion when the district court instructed the jury that it should consider an officer’s dual roles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).