United States v. Leonard A. Pelullo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that extended statute of limitations for wire fraud “affecting a financial institution” applicable where the defendant perpetrated fraud on wholly-owned subsidiary of financial institution
• noting that 18 U.S.C. § 3293(2) applies to a “broader class of crimes” than those “where the financial institution is the object of the fraud”
• noting that 18 U.S.C. § 3293(2) applies to a “broader class of crimes” than those “where the financial institution is the object of the fraud”
• stating that “duration remains the most significant factor” for continuity (citations omitted)
• “We have eschewed the notion that continuity is solely a temporal concept, though duration remains the most significant factor.”
• “These three issues [the Riccobene requirements] are questions of fact, which ... must be resolved by the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).