Skip to main content
First Circuit· 7/26/2002

United States v. Piper

Citations

  • 298 F.3d 47
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15010
  • 2002 WL 1626125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • specifying that only the \first half of this two-part requirement demands the introduction of extrinsic evidence\
  • explaining that, in order to withdraw, a conspirator must take affirmative action to disavow or defeat the conspiracy
  • stating that the \the proponent [of the statement] must present [extrinsic] evidence sufficient to delineate the conspiracy and corroborate the declarant's and the defendant's roles in it\
  • explaining that “[m]ere cessation of activity in furtherance of the conspiracy does not constitute withdrawal from a conspiracy” (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • specifying that only the \first half of this two-part requirement demands the introduction of extrinsic evidence\
  • explaining that an alleged co-conspirator's statements to an undercover DEA agent were admissible against the defendant because the alleged co-conspirator thought he was advancing the conspiracy by selling drugs to the undercover agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Lynch, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.